Alexandra Kane, Author at Rizio Hamilton & Kane P.C. - Page 5 of 5

Medical Malpractice Lawyer in Philadelphia

Joan River’s tragedy has brought medical malpractice into light in recent months. Rivers went into an endoscopy clinic for evaluation and treatment of vocal changes in connection with acid reflux. Her procedure was meant to be routine, however, it wound up being anything but that. She was administered a sedation drug called propofol (the same drug linked to Michael Jackson’s death) during a laryngoscopy. During the procedure, she went into cardiac arrest and it was eventually determined that she had low blood oxygen. Rivers was rushed to the hospital, where she remained on life support until she died a week later.

A federal agency, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), investigated and found that the clinic where Rivers underwent the procedure failed to notice a deterioration in her vital signs. Amongst a list of violations, the CMS found that the clinic failed to obtain her informed consent, and failed to document her weight accurately, which would have a direct relationship to how much propofol to administer to her.

Rivers’ situation is all too common. Medical malpractice happens. Doctors are human, and they make mistakes. But people are very hesitant to sue them. One issue that personal injury attorneys face is that the legal threshold to file a medical malpractice lawsuit is tremendous. A medical malpractice lawyer in Philadelphia must file a certificate of merit in addition to the complaint. The certificate of merit must include an opinion by a medical professional (a medical expert) which states that the plaintiff’s doctor or other medical personnel breached the standard of care owed to the plaintiff. This requirement has forced personal injury lawyers to shy away from filing malpractice lawsuits unless the case is a “slam dunk”.

Another issue faced by medical malpractice lawyers in Philadelphia is the sympathy factor. Doctors can be sympathetic. Juries don’t want to seemingly bankrupt doctors. But, juries may not know that an award in favor of the plaintiff is not paid out of the pocket of the defendant doctor, but out of the pocket of his insurance company.

At Rizio, Hamilton & Kane, we know the ins and outs of medical malpractice litigation, and we are not afraid to fight insurance companies for medical malpractice victims and their families. If you have been the victim of medical malpractice, and are looking for a medical malpractice lawyer in Philadelphia, call us for a free consultation.

Insurance Issues: Philadelphia Truck Accident Lawyer

Truck accidents involve a myriad of insurance issues for all injured parties. Often times, with tractor trailer accidents, the truck and the trailer are owned separately. Quite frequently, the driver owns the tractor while a different company owns the trailer and cargo. This scenario can lead to the question, is the driver an employee of the cargo company or an independent contractor? Who holds the insurance – the driver or the cargo company? Our Philadelphia truck accident lawyers can help you find the answers.

It has been our experience that arrangements like the above are usually purposeful, aimed to create confusion and serve as a basis for insurance companies to deny liability. A careful lawyer will make sure all parties are named in a lawsuit.

Additionally, truck owners and operators are required to carry higher limit insurance policies. These higher policies help compensate those who have been injured in the truck accident and offset the risk of the truck on the road … the bigger the vehicle, the more risk of injury it can cause.

Truckers are further required to follow state and federal regulations concerning cargo limits, truck maintenance and the length of time a driver can be behind the wheel. Violations of these regulations can prove helpful for a plaintiff’s case.

If you have been injured in a truck accident, call our Philadelphia truck accident lawyers. Truck accidents can have devastating effects on the lives of the injured and their families. Our experienced Philadelphia truck accident lawyers can help guide you on your road to recovery.

Texting and Driving: Philadelphia Car Accident Lawyer

A recent AT&T survey indicated that nearly all drivers who own cell phones understand that texting while driving is dangerous, yet almost 75 percent of them continue to text and drive anyway. It is well known that we have a serious problem across this country when it comes to texting and driving. Pennsylvania enacted a law, along with many other states, that bans texting and emailing while driving. But, is the law really working? As Philadelphia car accident lawyers, we see countless texting and driving accidents.

Despite our state enacted laws, many people are still injured and killed every day as a result of texting and driving. AT&T’s DriveMode application was designed to help lessen the number of texting and driving accidents. The free app silences text alerts while driving, and automatically replies to texts. The app even turns on automatically when the vehicle is moving.

AT&T has further designed a feature that allows parents to receive alerts when their child’s DriveMode is turned off, when the auto-mode is disabled or when a new speed dial number is added.

The app is available for various smart phones, such as iPhones and Androids.

We can all do our part to stop texting and driving. No text is worth it!

If you have been injured as a result of someone texting and driving, and you need a Philadelphia car accident lawyer, call our office today. As Philadelphia car accident lawyers, we will help you through your journey to recovery. Sometimes, car accidents can create complex medical, financial and insurance issues. If that sounds familiar, call our Philadelphia car accident lawyers for help!

Tragedy Avoided: Uninsured and Under Insured Motorist Coverage

In Pennsylvania, we are only required to carry $15,000 worth of bodily injury coverage. Car accident lawyers call it a minimum policy or a 15/30 policy. This means that if YOU cause an accident, and OTHERS are injured, with your minimum policy, the injured person would receive up to $15,000 for his or her injuries, no matter how severe the injuries are. In the event that more than one person is injured, they would be able to receive up to $30,000 total (split up according to each person’s injury). Ok, so, that doesn’t seem so horrible.

Now, let’s flip the scenario around. Let’s say “Bob” has a minimum policy, runs a red light, and strikes your car. You were in the ICU for four days, suffered two broken legs, broken ribs, a punctured lung and head trauma. Your hospital bill alone is over $50,000. Not to mention the fact that you lost your job, you need physical therapy, and you have no way to pay your mortgage or car payment. You will only to be able to recover $15,000, UNLESS, you selected uninsured/under insured motorist coverage (UM/UIM) on YOUR auto insurance policy. UM/UIM coverage saves the day!

UM/UIM coverage protects you from drivers who are not insured (in Philadelphia, that could be close to half of the drivers you encounter) or drivers those who carry minimum policies.   It is NOT expensive, and it is NECESSARY.  If you have children, especially teenagers, you need UM/UIM coverage. Your UM/UIM coverage generally extends to your resident relatives, or your family members that live with you.

So, let’s look at the teenage child example. Your daughter is a passenger in her boyfriend’s car, when he loses control and strikes a tree, severely injuring your daughter. Your daughter’s boyfriend only has a minimum policy (mmm…shocker). You hire a car accident lawyer. The car accident lawyer pursues a case against your daughter’s boyfriend. Actually, against his insurance company. (**Remember, the insurance company defends the case and pays the settlement or judgment, not the individual.**)

OPTION A: if you do NOT have UM/UIM, you can only receive $15,000, which, after liens and expenses, may not even pay for her tutors to help her catch up with her schoolwork.

OPTION B: if you do have UM/UIM, then you can recover the $15,000 from the boyfriend’s insurance PLUS the difference from your UM/UIM. So, if you have a $100,000 UM/UIM policy, and you have two vehicles, stacked, (stacking increases the coverage by the number of cars you have on the policy – a $100,000 UIM policy with two cars is $200,000 worth of UIM coverage) then you may receive up to $185,000 to make up for the boyfriend’s lack of coverage.

I think we would all choose OPTION B. Now, take a look at your policy to make sure you have included UM/UIM in your auto insurance! If you are not sure, call one of our car accident lawyers, and they can help evaluate your situation in a FREE consultation.

 

Car Accident Attorney: Full Tort or Limited Tort

So, you were in a car accident, and your car accident attorney asks you whether you are Full Tort or Limited Tort. What on earth does that mean?

Most of our clients think that Full Tort means Full Coverage, which is very far from the truth. If you selected Limited Tort, which most people do, because the premium is less for the Limited Tort option, then you CANNOT recover for the pain and suffering that you endured as a result of your car accident unless you prove that you have suffered a serious impairment of a bodily function, permanent disfigurement or death. That’s a pretty tough threshold to meet. You can recover for economic damages or out-of-pocket expenses, like your medical bills and wage loss. However, you will not be able to recover beyond those numbers.

There are some exceptions to the Limited Tort rule, such as being struck by a drunk driver, or being struck by an out-of-state registered vehicle. But, for the most part, those exceptions are fairly rare. Seek out an experienced car accident attorney, because Limited Tort cases can be complex. And you will need an attorney well versed in auto law in order to argue that you can meet the Limited Tort threshold. In all honesty, most car accident attorneys will not touch Limited Tort Cases.

So, what should you do now? It is extremely important for you to review your auto insurance policy. Look at your Declarations page, and check for your Tort option. Most often, your insurance agent just gave you a few quotes, and you picked the one that best fit your budget, without realizing the ramifications of your choice. Nuances of insurance policies are rarely explained to the customer, which is one reason why PA’s Tort option can be so unfair to the insured. You may have had absolutely no idea of the magnitude of the rights that you waived when you purchased your policy.

The amount of money that you could lose as a result of opting for Limited Tort insurance is far more than paying a little more each month in premiums. Also, don’t forget that your Tort option will extend to your family members, such as your children or other relatives in your home. We have had several cases where parents are devastated when they realize that their child will be unable to recover because of their Limited Tort option.

Remember, request a copy of your policy, and ask lost of questions. The best decision is an informed decision. Call one of our experienced car accident attorneys to figure out whether you are Limited Tort, and if so, whether you can get over the Limited Tort threshold.

Defective Guardrails Causing Injury and Death

All across America, highways are lined with Trinity Industries’ guardrails. It has come to the attention of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) that these guardrails are actually piercing vehicles and slicing into occupants. The injuries from these guardrails include severed limbs and death.

How is it possible that something that is designed to protect people is actually injuring and killing people? Apparently, the guardrail manufacturer made the decision to shorten a piece of metal on the end of the guardrail from 5 inches to 4 inches, creating a savings for their company of $2 per piece, totaling $50,000 per year. This modification, according to victims, changes the way the guardrail absorbs impact. So, instead of ribboning upon impact, the guardrail locks up, and slices through the vehicle.

The subject guardrails were only approved by the FHWA with the 5 inch metal piece. Trinity Industries failed to disclose the 4 inch modification to the government. The rails were installed in states without their approval of the modification. As a result, four states have already halted the use of the guardrail. Will Pennsylvania do the same? We don’t know. But we do know that these guardrails are installed on PA roads. There has already been at least one Pennsylvanian injured. She lost her leg in a crash.

A Texas jury recently found against Trinity industries, and awarded $175 million in damages, most of which goes to the government. The jury determined that Trinity defrauded the government when it sold modified guardrails to states without disclosing the modification. Trinity Industries will appeal the jury’s determination. Meanwhile, the recent news coverage only serves to aid injury attorneys across the country in their representation of those injured or killed by the guardrails.

Car Accident Attorney – Defective Airbags

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued a consumer advisory on October 20, 2014, urging owners of numerous models of Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Mazda, BMW and GM vehicles to heed recall notices immediately. The vehicles listed in the consumer advisory were recalled because they may contain defective Takata made airbags, which have caused several deaths around the country. The faulty airbags essentially explode at the time of a crash because the propellant inside the airbag burns too hot, ruptures its container, and sends metal parts flying into the face and chest of the very person it is intended to protect. According to The New York Times, the wounds from the defective airbags resemble stab wounds.

The problem is so bad that Toyota is warning owners of the vehicles listed in the recall not to allow passengers to ride in the front seat. While Honda does not have the parts it needs to fix the problem and make its cars safe for occupants. Apparently, Honda is only sending out recall warnings as the parts to fix the problem become available.

It is unclear whether the problem only occurs in high humidity areas; however, high humidity areas have taken priority on the recall list.

From a legal standpoint, Takata and the applicable car manufacturer will probably point the finger at each other, which could actually make litigation favorable for the plaintiff. Some important questions in any litigation about this major safety issue will be whether the car manufacturer and Takata knew about the defect, and for how long, how swift was the recall, and whether current warnings are adequate. What kind of testing did Takata do on the airbags? It would definitely be interesting to see the communications between the airbag manufacturer and the car manufacturer in connection with the defective airbags. Either way, from a products liability standpoint, we all know that something designed to protect should not become something that kills.

One thing is for sure: if you own a vehicle on the recall list, make sure to immediately send your vehicle in for the necessary repairs! Protect yourself, your family and your friends by not allowing anyone to ride in the front seat until you take your car to be repaired. Of course, if there is a faulty airbag on the driver’s side, the driver will not be protected until the necessary fix is implemented.  Go to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration website at www.nhtsa.gov and search for the recall list to see if your vehicle could contain a defective airbag.

If you were injured in an accident, and need to speak to a car accident attorney, call us today.  One of our car accident attorneys will give you a free consultation.

Testimonial

S.S.

“A HUGE thanks to Mike Kane and all the staff for helping me out with my case. I couldn’t be happier with the team, their hard work, or the outcome!”

-S.S.

S.J.

“Anytime and everytime I need legal help, my choice is Rizio, Hamilton & Kane. With them, my concerns become theirs. THEY fight for you, and they win!!! I recommend to anyone who needs an attorney, choose Rizio, Hamilton & Kane…”

-S.J.

S.S.

“5 out of 5 … RH&K was great and fast on my lawsuit!”

-S.S.

M.M.

“The best of the best. Very good attorneys…..highly recommend this firm – especially Mike Kane.”

-M.M.

Get a FREE Consultation!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Please verify that you read the disclaimer

Verified by MonsterInsights